INITIAL SITUATION
- A facility management department was undergoing a transformational phase after finishing the construction of a car manufacturing plant.
- The contractors and external support was reduced +90% and all the processes became the responsibility of the company’s team
- The project execution had to respect the production time & schedule, and this led to a delay in the execution of most projects. By the last quarter of the year, the yearly budget spent hardly reached 30%
PROJECT DESCRIPTION | APPROACH METHODS
- P3 acts as the link between the facility management
- A tracking tool was developed to visualize purchase orders status, and potential delays in orders release.
- A budget execution tool was developed, able to track in detail the status of each budget item
- Weekly escalation meetings with area director and managers to decide on projects to be cancelled, shifted, delayed, etc. The meeting results are then deployed to execution team to set priorities.
PROJECT RESULTS
- The project execution follow-up was done until the last week of the year and the end of year final report was delivered with final budget execution
- Purchase orders were released on a daily basis (vs. unregular releases) and were streamlined to promote the fastest execution possible
- Budget execution achieved 93% of the committed forecast
- +40% of the purchase orders released in the year were released during the steering period done by P3
- The developed tracking tools and methods were handed over to the company to strenghten process adherence